Cases 41 - 50 of 198
Romero v. Tooele County et al
as 2:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Brad Young, Wilbert Tso, Tooele County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Dalton Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hanover Insurance Company v. American International School of Utah et al
as 2:2019cv00567
Defendant:
American International School, Michael Farley, Tasi Young and others
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Presley v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jason Aron Presley and Ernest John Young
Defendant:
Western States, General Motors, Dick Dibble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilson v. Tooele City Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Tooele City Police Department, Scott Schovaers, Brian White and others
Plaintiff:
Seven V. Wilson
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Living Essential Oils v. Moonliliy Wellness
as 2:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Moonliliy Wellness
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Young Living Essential Oils v. Kingston et al
as 2:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Ethica Company, The and Celeste Kingston
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Young Living Essential Oils v. Sadowski
as 2:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Emily Sadowski
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Liddiard v. Pedersen et al
as 2:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Robin Escobar, Matt Pedersen, Frank Young and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Liddiard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Happy Baby et al v. Sakura Bloom LLC
as 2:2018cv00960
Defendant:
Sakura Bloom LLC
Plaintiff:
Happy Baby and Mary Elizabeth Young
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
