Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Young v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Robert Young
Defendant:
Tony Mancuso, Toney Edwards, Eric Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bassett et al
as 5:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
James Darrnell Young, Sr
Defendant:
J M Bassett, Detective Henry, Detective Robalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweat v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
William Sweat
Defendant:
Jimmy Scott, Toney Lambert, Courtney Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Brent Thompson, Jessie Bellamy, Krystle Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweat v. Lambert et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
William Sweat
Defendant:
Toney Lambert, Paulen North, Courtney Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Pollitt
as 5:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
James Darrnell Young, Sr
Defendant:
M Pollitt and Brandy Nicole Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Sanchez Smith
Defendant:
Kieth Cooley, Bobby Young and James M LeBlance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Unknown Guards
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wesley Banks
Defendant:
Unknown Guards, Young, Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Simms
Defendant:
Roger Young, Logen Robichaux and Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2022cv05788
Plaintiff:
Demetricius Young
Defendant:
State of Louisiana and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
