Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Taylor v. Hattiesburg Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Briggette Taylor
Defendant:
Hattiesburg Police Department, Officer Chad Young, Officer Unknown Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Secherest et al v. City of Lexington et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Leroy Secherest, Damion Levy, Tyqwon Walden and others
Defendant:
City of Lexington, Robin McRory, Charles Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney Gooden v. Jackson Public Schools et al
as 3:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
Vicki L. Chaney Gooden
Defendant:
Jackson Public Schools, Campus Enforcement, Roosevelt Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bennett v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Tim Bennett
Defendant:
Ken Young and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis et al v. Young
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Diandra Davis and La'Dharion Davis
Defendant:
Deonta Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tim Bennett
Defendant:
Ken Young and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate et al v. Zaleski et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Plaintiff:
Darshaun Young, Dena Myers, Angela Tate and others
Defendant:
Total Foot Care, Hattiesburg Total Foot Care, Company John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
