Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Young v. City of Richland, Mississippi
as 3:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Arthur Young
Defendant:
City of Richland, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young et al v. West Point, Mississippi, Municipal Election Commission et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Chiketa Young , Larry Stevenson , Kiara Lane and others
Defendant:
West Point, Mississippi, Municipal Election Commission , Municipal Election Committee , Betty Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. City of Meridian et al
as 4:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Meridian , County of Lauderdale , Frank Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Young v. Howard Industries
as 2:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Timothy Young
Defendant:
Howard Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ashcraft et al v. City of Vicksburg et al
as 5:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ashcraft and Randy Daniel Isaiah Ashcraft
Defendant:
City of Vicksburg , Paul Winfield , Victor Gray-Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Young v. Sterling Medical Corporation
as 3:2011cv00627
Plaintiff:
Latarrand Young
Defendant:
Sterling Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011mc00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
