Cases 1 - 10 of 82
YOUNG v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv04853
Petitioner:
SPENCER YOUNG
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. SCHLUSSELFELD et al
as 3:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. YOUNG
Defendant:
MATTHEW SCHLUSSELFELD, DUANE GRADE, DANIEL CACICIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2023cv20485
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, A. GANGI, C. SEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SANTIAGO v. YOUNG
as 2:2023cv01815
Petitioner:
MANUEL SANTIAGO
Respondent:
JOHN A. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2022cv05943
Plaintiff:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, MICHAEL LNU and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2022cv05222
Plaintiff:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.O.C. and RICHARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOGAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. LOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, DAVID S. OWENS and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOMASSINI v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
RUBEN TOMASSINI
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID OWENS and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
