Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Gonzalez v. Gilpin et al
as 9:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Arce Gonzalez
Defendant:
CDO Gilpin, Major Sires, Romero Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Garland et al
as 9:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. The State of New York
as 9:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
John Shicobra Young and John Young
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. State Of New York et al
as 9:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
John Curry
Defendant:
State of New York, Rodney Young, Ms. Charvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. All Employment
as 9:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
John Shicobra Young and John Young
Defendant:
All Employment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. McKoy et al
as 9:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shawn Green
Defendant:
Jeff McKoy, Donald E. Venettozzi, Jane/John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2021cv00970
Plaintiff:
Clifton A. Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
DOCCS, New York State, Melissa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2021cv00858
Plaintiff:
Treamon Elmore
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, Onondaga County, AJA Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Department of Justice
as 9:2021cv00582
Respondent:
Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Eckert
as 9:2019cv01243
Respondent:
Stewart Eckert
Petitioner:
Talarico Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
