Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01745
Plaintiff:
Marsha Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01564
Petitioner:
Edward L Young
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Dana Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Kohl's Inc.
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Tammy E. Young
Defendant:
Kohl's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Thompson v. Springhetti et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Thompson
Defendant:
Scott Springhetti, Luke McKee, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Liesha Young
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Catherine Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
