Torts - Property Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Young v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01079
Plaintiff: RICK YOUNG
Defendant: SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BOWERS et al v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv02897
Plaintiff: STEPHEN BOWERS and AMY BOWERS
Defendant: VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and YOUNG VOLKSWAGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv01063
Plaintiff: JOSHUA DAVIS
Defendant: VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and YOUNG VOLKSWAGEN MAZDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WHITE v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2013cv06771
Plaintiff: ALPHONSO WHITE
Defendant: TAWANA THOMPSON, JANIE G. YOUNG, JOHN RUFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
NORTHWEST SAVINGS BANK v. YOUNG TITLE AGENCY
as 1:2011cv00247
Plaintiff: NORTHWEST SAVINGS BANK
Defendant: YOUNG TITLE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kakareka et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2011cv00595
Plaintiff: Charles M. Kakareka and Carissa A. Young
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES et al v. THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK et al
as 2:2009cv03035
Plaintiff: ROBIN HOLMES and RICHARD YOUNG
Defendant: THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK and ELECTRA ACCESSORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
JEONG v. SEO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv03718
Plaintiff: UK JEONG
Defendant: JUSTIN SEO, ANTHONY PAEK and YOUNG CHA CHONG
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARTIN et al v. GREEN et al
as 2:2007cv03311
Plaintiff: GREGORY MARTIN and BANANA BOX WHOLESALE GROCERY
Defendant: MORRIO GREEN, ANGIE YOUNG, DEVIN SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHUNG et al v. CHOI et al
as 2:2007cv02187
Plaintiff: PAE YOUNG CHUNG and SUK CHUNG
Defendant: BYONG JIK CHOI and IN SOK CHOI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?