Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Morris v. Rowland et al
as 3:2023cv03300
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Major Rowland, Lt. Zang, Bradley Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Evans et al
as 3:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
C/O Evans, Lt. Zang, Bradley Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sherry Benton, Margaret Madole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zang v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00678
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James Zang
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Hasemyer et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jeramey R Brown
Defendant:
Chad Hasemyer, Jessica Huffman, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Keifer et al
as 3:2021cv01109
Plaintiff:
Andrew Carr
Defendant:
C/O Keifer and C. Zang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Scott et al
as 3:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Shawn MacBeth, Curtis Cowell, Anthony Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Denzil Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braboy v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00922
Plaintiff:
Damien Braboy
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jacqueline A. Lashbrook, Caleb E. Zang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Harrington et al
as 3:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
Maurecus Adams
Defendant:
Richard Harrington, Kim Butter, Christi Rayburs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Hoppensted et al
as 3:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
James Hoppensted, Lieutenant Whitley, Kent Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
