Cases 41 - 50 of 1,114
Yanmei Zhang v. David M. Radel
as 2:2023cv07764
Plaintiff:
Yanmei Zhang
Defendant:
David M. Radel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Zhang v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv06858
Plaintiff:
Xudong Zhang
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re Naturalization Ceremony 9/13/2023
as 3:2023mc80224
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Oleksandra Boiko Acosta, Neftaly de Jesus Aguilar Rodriguez and others
Bally Produce Corporation v. Deng et al
as 1:2023cv06580
Plaintiff:
Bally Produce Corporation
Defendant:
Long Deng and Ming Zhe Zhang
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
In re: NIO, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 23-1190
Petitioner:
NIO Inc., Bin Li, Louis T. Hsieh and others
Respondent:
Jonathan Tan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Eva Huang
Qian Zhang v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 2:2023cv06833
Plaintiff:
QIAN ZHANG
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lei Zhang v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 5:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
LEI ZHANG
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHANG et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
YONGGANG ZHANG and QING YANG
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Xin Zhang v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv06693
Plaintiff:
XIN ZHANG
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Junzheng Zhang v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 2:2023cv06613
Plaintiff:
JUNZHENG ZHANG
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
