Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Telebrands Corp. v. LaBolt et al
as 3:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Telebrands Corp.
Defendant:
Davis LaBolt, Saluvera LLC, Luminas International LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wu v. Sushi Nomado of Manhattan, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04661
Plaintiff:
Jian Wu
Defendant:
Sushi Nomado of Manhattan, Inc., Sushi Para 33 Corporation, Sushi Para Manhattan, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NHL Enterprises, L.P. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv08239
Plaintiff:
NHL Enterprises, L.P.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" and Zhou Lin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
CORTEZ et al V. JP MORGAN CHASE, et al
as 2:2011cv05526
Plaintiff:
ROMEO CORTEZ , AMELITA CORTEZ , NILDA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE, WASHINGTON MUTUAL, MANUFACTURERS TRUST COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Lin v. Holder
as 10-3993
Petitioner:
Mao Zhou Lin, AKA Mao Zai Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Ni v. Holder
as 10-1018
Petitioner:
Zhou Lin Ni
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
