Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jones et al v. Cixi Jiangnan Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Markal Jones and Stephanie Jones
Defendant:
Cixi Jiangnan Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd., Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd., Zim Integrated Shipping Services (China) Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC v. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
as 2:2021cv00108
Defendant:
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Trejos v. Formosa Plastics Corporation, USA et al
as 4:2014cv03565
Plaintiff:
Jaime A Trejos
Defendant:
Formosa Plastics Corporation, USA , Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Zim American Integrated Shipping Services Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zim American Integrated Shipping Services Company, Inc. et al v. Amerasia Line, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
Zim American Integrated Shipping Services Company, Inc. , Zim Jamaica Maritime Co. S.A.R.L. and Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
Defendant:
Amerasia Line, Inc. and Ceres Gulf, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Amerasia Line, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ceres Gulf, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
SKC, Inc. v. MV ZIM BARCELONA et al
as 4:2009cv02966
Plaintiff:
SKC, Inc.
Defendant:
MV ZIM BARCELONA, Zim Barcelona Maritime Company S.a.r.l., Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
Versa Marketing, Inc. v. Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
as 4:2009cv02698
Plaintiff:
Versa Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
Global Fibres, Inc. v. Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
as 4:2008cv00523
Plaintiff:
Global Fibres, Inc.
Defendant:
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
