Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Potts v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01161
Plaintiff:
Ronald Potts
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc , Zimmer Holdings Inc , Zimmer Surgical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Nancy Scott and Stanley Scott
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Production Inc., Zimmer US, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Potts v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
Ronald Potts
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Surgical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerumbo v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Mary Jerumbo
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer US, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zimmer US, Inc. v. Hickman
as 6:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Zimmer US, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Wayne Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zimmer US, Inc. v. Hickman
as 6:2013cv00558
Plaintiff:
Zimmer US, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Wayne Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zimmer US, Inc. v. Hickman
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Zimmer US, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Wayne Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zimmer US Inc et al v. Ford
as 3:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Zimmer US Inc and Zimmer Inc
Defendant:
David R Ford, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lemus v. Zimmer, US, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Raul Lemus
Defendant:
Zimmer, US, Inc. , Zimmer Renovo, LLC , Steve G Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dollgener v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01337
Plaintiff:
James Dollgener
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc , Zimmer Production, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
