Cases 1 - 10 of 34
The Continental Insurance Company v. Providence Washington Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv03197
Plaintiff:
The Continental Insurance Company, as successor in interest to certain rights and liabilities of Harbor Insurance Company and Buffalo Reinsurance Company
Defendant:
Providence Washington Insurance Company, as successor in interest by way of merger to Seaton Insurance Company, f/k/a Unigard Security Insurance Company, f/k/a Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Assicurazioni Generali, SPA, Harper Insurance Limited, f/k/a Turegum Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Utica National Assurance Company v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11267
Plaintiff:
Utica National Assurance Company
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, Inc. as Successor in Interest to Amazon.com.DEDC, LLC, Amazon.com.DEDC, LLC and Amazon.com Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kellogg et al v. Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE L. KELLOGG and BRIANNE K. DEROSA
Defendant:
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and Talcott Resolution Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Peters Gallery of New York, Inc v. Successors-in-Interest to Eberstadt & Sons et al
as 1:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Peters Gallery of New York, Inc, dba Gerald Peters Gallery
Defendant:
Successors-in-Interest to Eberstadt & Sons aka Edward Eberstadt & Sons, The Estate of Lindley Eberstadt, The Estate of Charles Eberstadt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, as succ v. National Indemnity Company
as 22-1947
Plaintiff:
Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, as successorininterest to Constitution Reinsurance Corporation and Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, as successor-in-interest to Constitution Reinsurance Corporation
Counter Claimant:
National Indemnity Company
Edgewood Partners Insurance Center v. PPD Development, L.P.
as 1:2022cv06957
Defendant:
PPD Development, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Edgewood Partners Insurance Center d/b/a Edgewood Partners Insurance Agency, as successor in interest to INTEGRO USA, Inc. and Edgewood Partners Insurance Center Inc. doing business as Edgewood Partners Insurance Agency, as successor in interest to INTEGRO USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, as successor-in-interest to Constitution Reinsurance Corporation v. National Indemnity Co.
as 1:2022cv03785
Plaintiff:
Global Reinsurance Corporation of America, as successor-in-interest to Constitution Reinsurance Corporation
Defendant:
National Indemnity Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Zolo Services Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company as successor in interest to Western Heritage Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Zolo Services Corp. and Quality Building Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
KeyBank National Association v. Tuscaloosa Charter Service, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
KeyBank National Association, successor in interest to Key Equipment Finance and KeyBank National Association
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa Charter Service, LLC and Clifton Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
KeyBank National Association v. Complete Radiology Management Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03270
Defendant:
Musculoskeletal Imaging Consultants, LLC, Douglas K. Smith, Complete Radiology Management Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KeyBank National Association, successor in interest to Key Equipment Finance and KeyBank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
