Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Davis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02226
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Davis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23948
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ann Davis
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv13428
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ann Davis and Kris Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11685
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01249
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Davis and Jerry Davis
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Ann Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31028
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv30732
Plaintiff:
Chryl Ann Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24797
Plaintiff:
Raquel Gonzalez, Clarita Dudley, Mary Boggs and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems, Holdings Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
