Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martin Defense Group, LLC v. Aspen American Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Martin Defense Group, LLC
Defendant:
Aspen American Insurance Company, Clifford H. W. Chen and Doe Defendants 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Akana et al v. Rhea et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Stacy Duke Akana and Xarbin Industries SP
Defendant:
Rhea, Gary Chen, Doe Defendants 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Martin Defense Group, LLC v. Kao
as 1:2022cv00283
Defendant:
Tiffany Jennifer Lam, Martin Kao, Jenny Lam and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Defense Group, LLC and Navatek Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scutt v. Dorris et al
as 1:2020cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jason Scutt
Defendant:
Xiayin (Gaoquiang) Lin, Kelli Dorris and Charlene Chen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bankhead et al v. Sutton et al
as 1:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Leah Voorhies, Chris Rogers, Dallas Earnshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Kinzer and Stacy Bankhead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1153 b5
Trang v. Healthmate International, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Trang
Defendant:
Healthmate International, LLC, Mei Dodson and Shawn Chen
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
