Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Couvillon v. Cintas Corp #2
as 6:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Kim E Couvillon
Defendant:
Cintas Corp #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
J Duncan Enterprises L L C et al v. Cintas Corp #2
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
J. Duncan Enterprises, LLC and JV Duncan Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Coleman et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 6:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Billie Coleman and David Coleman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Galata Chemicals, LLC
as 2:2020cv01381
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Defendant:
Galata Chemicals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dupuis v. Cintas Corp
as 6:2020cv00496
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation d/b/a Cintas Lafayette
Plaintiff:
Theresa Dupuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Poke Loa - Harahan, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Poke Loa Old Metairie, Poke Loa - Harahan, LLC, Poke Loa - Mandeville, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Placide et al v. Cintas Corp #2 et al
as 6:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Cintas Corp #2 and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Anthony Placide and Zephelfilia Broussard Placide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Louisiana Health Service et al
as 3:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company, Cintas Corporation Welfare Plan and Anthem Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Tracie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
