Cases 11 - 20 of 2,427
THE GEO GROUP, INC. v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2024cv04990
Plaintiff:
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Manuel Zuna-Paramo, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1680
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALEXANDER ZUNA-PARAMO, DEISY ANGELICA GUAMAN-BONILLA and D. S. Z.-G.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McDaniels v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
John McDaniels
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
Red Dragon Partners, LLC v. TruthMD, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Red Dragon Partners, LLC
Defendant:
TruthMD, LLC, Gemma Cunningham, Dr. Charles D. Rosen and others
Michael RinaldiIn re: Michael Rinaldi
as 24-1610
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL RINALDI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT D. MARIANI
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
C.C. v. UNITES STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 3:2024cv04391
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Defendant:
UNITES STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, NEWARK ASYLUM OFFICE, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. JOY ROCKWELL ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04389
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOY ROCKWELL ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a POSTCARDMANIA PCM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
