Cases 41 - 50 of 2,423
Larry MarvelIn re: Larry Marvel
as 24-1216
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY D. MARVEL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Douglas Menjivar Mejia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1183
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS JAVIER MENJIVAR MEJIA, RUTH NOEMY RIVERA DE MENJIVAR, BRANDON STEVEN GAMEZ RIVERA and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Brandon Fake, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1113
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and CAITLIN B. FAKE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Thompson v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
Sammy Belle v. , et alIn re: Sammy Belle v. , et al
as 24-1125
Petitioner:
In re: SAMMY D. BELLE
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
SIMON v. AIRSTREAM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY P SIMON
Defendant:
AIRSTREAM, INC. and COLONIAL RV D/B/A COLONIAL AIRSTREAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Default
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Erica Manuel-Soto, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1089
Petitioner:
ERICA NOHEMI MANUEL-SOTO, ELFEGO ISMAEL ESTRADA-SIMON, D. E. E.-M. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
