Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kessing v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Derick C Kessing
Defendant:
Smith, P. Temple, J. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farabee v. Artrip et al
as 7:2020cv00534
Defendant:
J. Doss, Captain Olinger, Michael Henderlite and others
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Farabee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muslimani et al v. R & P Lucas Underground Utilities, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Muharam Muslimani , James Brown , Henry Hart, III and others
Defendant:
R & P Lucas Underground Utilities, Inc., Ronnie L. Lucas and Patricia A. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Banks et al
as 3:2015cv00747
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Brown
Defendant:
A. Banks and Inder Jeet Singh Gujral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stephenson Printing Inc. v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Printing Inc.
Defendant:
James Brown , Stuart Wolffe , William Malone and others
Counter_claimant:
David Uslan , Stuart Wolffe , James Brown and others
Counter_defendant:
Stephenson Printing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Freeman Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Freeman Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Grantham v. Watson et al
as 2:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Grantham
Defendant:
Bryan Watson, Maj. John C. Combs, Lt. James Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Virginia Department of Corrections
as 3:2008cv00065
Petitioner:
Dennis James Brown
Respondent:
Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
