Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Weichuan Deng et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2023cv06703
Plaintiff:
Weichuan Deng and Jin Huang
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dong Huang v. William Barr
as 20-71879
Petitioner:
DONG JIM HUANG, AKA Dong Jin Huang
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07454
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. C & R Rock Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00114
Defendant:
C & R Rock Inc., Jin Huang, Johnny Zeng and others
Plaintiff:
Yin Gui Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Chen v. C & R Rock Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05175
Plaintiff:
Yin Gui Chen
Defendant:
C & R Rock Inc., Johnny Zeng, Mark Zeng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Byron Brown v. Ambow Education Holding Ltd et al
as 2:2012cv05480
Defendant:
Ambow Education Holding Ltd, Paul Chow and Jin Huang
Plaintiff:
Byron Brown
Srikanth Gudimetla v. Ambow Education Holding Ltd. et al
as 2:2012cv05062
Defendant:
Ambow Education Holding Ltd., Paul Chow and Jin Huang
Plaintiff:
Srikanth Gudimetla
Shan et al v. Koo Sushi Fusion Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06955
Plaintiff:
Ru Dong Shan and Xi Dong Wang
Defendant:
Koo Sushi Fusion Inc., Andy Huang and Xiu Jin Huang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mintel Learning Technology, Inc. v. Ambow Education Holding, Ltd et al
as 5:2011cv01504
Plaintiff:
Mintel Learning Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Ambow Education Holding, Ltd and Jin Huang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zhong Huang v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-14745
Petitioner:
ZHONG JIN HUANG, Hiromitsu Morikawa
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
