Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv17294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Does 1-20 et al
as 2:2025cv01681
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com Inc and Amazon Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Adrian Bylykbashi, Eric Thai, Kai Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Apple Inc. v. Rivos, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv02637
Defendant:
Shih-Chieh Wen, Ricky Wen, Bhasi Kaithamana and others
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc., a California Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Rivos, Inc., Jim Hardage and Weidong Ye
Counter Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Stephen Swedlow
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nobis Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv10886
Plaintiff:
Nobis Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zhang yi, Yu Sen Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00018
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wang v. Holder
as 11-2043
Petitioner:
Zhen Kai Wang
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv02381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
