Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wyatt et al v. University of Maryland
as 1:2023cv00742
Defendant:
Leeann Akouri-Shan, University of Maryland, Darryll Pines and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Wyatt, Hao Li, Yudong Zhang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Zhen Lin, et al
as 22-2858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
ZHEN FENG LIN and LI CHEN
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Zhen Lin, et al
as 22-2776
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant:
ZHEN FENG LIN and LI CHEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wen et al v. New York City Regional Center, LLC
as 1:2022cv07383
Plaintiff:
WEN BAI, XIAOLING CAO, YAN CAO and others
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY REGIONAL CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Chen v. Garland
as 22-1348
Petitioner:
XIAO LI CHEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chen et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv03039
Plaintiff:
Li Chen and Thomas Stivers
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Kevin J. Riddle, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
