Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Androb Jewelry Service, Inc. v. Malca-Amit USA, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2017cv05976
Plaintiff:
Androb Jewelry Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Malca-Amit Armored, Inc., Malca-Amit North America, Inc., Malca-Amit Security Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Nestor Abundiz v. Malca-Amit Armored, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv06399
Plaintiff:
Nestor Abundiz
Defendant:
Does and Malca-Amit Armored, Inc.
Androb Jewelry Service, Inc. v. Malca-Amit USA, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2016cv05171
Plaintiff:
Androb Jewelry Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Malca-Amit USA, L.L.C. , Malca-Amit Security Services, Inc. , Malca-Amit Armored, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Malca-Amit USA, L.L.C.
as 1:2013cv08710
Plaintiff:
XL Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Malca-Amit USA, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIBSON v. KYTMANOV et al
as 3:2013cv01967
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GIBSON and MARY GIBSON
Defendant:
ANDREY KYTMANOV and MALCA-AMIT ARMORED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
B.B.Y. Diamond Corporation v. Malca-Amit USA LLC
as 1:2011cv05094
Plaintiff:
B.B.Y. Diamond Corporation
Defendant:
Malca-Amit USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pieri 18 S.L. et al v. Malca-Amit USA, LLC
as 1:2011cv03504
Plaintiff:
Pieri 18 S.L. and Pietro Magliocca
Defendant:
Malca-Amit USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv24408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105
Misle v. Belasera at Pine Island Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv21498
Plaintiff:
Maria Misle
Defendant:
Belasera at Pine Island Condominium Association, Inc., The Continental Group, Inc., Victor Malca and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv23201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
