Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hizon International, LLC v. Malca-Amit USA LLC et al
as 2:2026cv06752
Plaintiff:
Hizon International, LLC
Defendant:
Malca-Amit USA LLC and Does 1-5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Malca-Amit Customhouse Brokers, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv02008
Plaintiff:
Malca-Amit Customhouse Brokers, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Flores-Malca v. Blanche
as 26-619
Petitioner:
ERIC ROLANDO FLORES-MALCA
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Goldstein et al v. Syrian Arab Republic
as 1:2025cv10876
Plaintiff:
Saul Goldstein, Mordechai Goldstein, Miriam Goldstein and others
Defendant:
Syrian Arab Republic
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Heching et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2025cv10862
Plaintiff:
Norman Heching, Estate of Joseph Werfel, Avraham Nefoussi and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Malca v. E & Q Floors LLC
as 3:2025cv01331
Plaintiff:
Monica Malca
Defendant:
E & Q Floors LLC doing business as Riva Spain
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Flores-Malca v. Garland
as 24-5411
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ERIC ROLANDO FLORES-MALCA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Cement Masons and Plasterers Local No. 502 Pension Fund v. InMode Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Cement Masons and Plasterers Local No. 502 Pension Fund
Defendant:
InMode Ltd., Moshe Mizrahy, Yair Malca and others
Malca v. NYC Shoprite Associates, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
Ana Malca and NYC Shoprite Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
