Cases 21 - 30 of 1,458
MOTOLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv24709
Petitioner:
PERRY FRANCIS MONTOLO and PERRY FRANCIS MOTOLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANY / ALL AGENTS CONTRACTORS EMPLOYEES PRINCIPALS AND THIRD PARTY INTERVENORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WALTERS v. PERRY et al
as 4:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
RAMEL WALTERS
Defendant:
R PERRY and N OLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Moody et al
as 2:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry and Mosheh Ben Israel
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ricky Dixion, Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Mercado et al
as 2:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Donald Perry and Mosheh Ben Israel
Defendant:
Mercado, Jason Brenes, C. Sboto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHEN-VICENS v. PERRY
as 3:2023cv24665
Plaintiff:
JORY L STEPHEN-VICENS
Defendant:
PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANNELL v. FOLSOM et al
as 5:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
JAMES JUSTIN CHANNELL
Defendant:
ROWDY FOLSOM, LIKELY, NATASHA GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHEN-VICENS v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
JORY L STEPHEN-VICENS
Defendant:
PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31177
Plaintiff:
PERRY KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30688
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PERRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
