Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bruce v. Pacheco
as 0:2021cv00217
Petitioner:
Perry Bruce, Sr
Respondent:
Michael Pacheco, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rubeck v. Brammer
as 0:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Jay Michael Brammer
Plaintiff:
Dennis Perri Rubeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubeck v. Brewster
as 0:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Sweetwater County and Hilary Knighton Brewster
Plaintiff:
Dennis Perri Rubeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubeck v. Sweetwater County Assessor
as 0:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Sweetwater County Assessor and Dave Divis
Plaintiff:
Dennis Perri Rubeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Lampert et al
as 2:2019cv00269
Respondent:
Robert Lampert and Wyoming Attorney General
Petitioner:
Perry Bruce, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Study v. Peabody Investments Corp and Affiliates Welfare Benefit Plan et al
as 2:2019cv00211
Plaintiff:
Perry Study
Defendant:
Lincoln Financial Group and Peabody Investments Corp and Affiliates Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perry v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00057
Petitioner:
Bobby Gene Perry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fridley et al v. Weber et al
as 2:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Colleen Fridley and Perry Fridley
Defendant:
Karl Weber, Tina Weber and Gros Ventre River Ranch LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bush v. District Court of Campbell County et al
as 2:2008cv00275
Plaintiff:
Tucker Bush
Defendant:
District Court of Campbell County, Campbell County District Court Judge, John R Perry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dehaan v. Rockvam et al
as 2:2007cv00257
Plaintiff:
Rudolf Dehaan
Defendant:
Perry Rockvam, Cody Police Department Representative, Cody Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
