Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DORTY v. THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR SCHEDULING AND IMPLEMENTING PLAINTIFFS MAY 20, 2025, URGENT PODIATRY REFERRAL AT SCI-MAHANOY et al
as 2:2026cv04448
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DORTY
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR SCHEDULING AND IMPLEMENTING PLAINTIFFS MAY 20, 2025, URGENT PODIATRY REFERRAL AT SCI-MAHANOY, THE INDIVIDUAL(S) RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVING AND/OR REVIEWING OUTSIDE SPECIALTY CARE REQUESTS FOR PLAINTIFF BETWEEN MAY 20, 2025 AND SEPTEMBER 2, 2025 and DR. STEPHANIE SANTORO, DO, MPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE: Nevro Corporation Spinal Cord Stimulator Products Liability Litigation
as MDL No. 3195
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Liaison Counsel for Defendants
TEST PLAINTIFF v. TEST DEFENDANT
as 2:2026cv09999
Plaintiff:
TEST PLAINTIFF and PERRY SMITH
Defendant:
TEST DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pittman et al v. Sessoms et al
as 2:2026cv00645
Plaintiff:
Renarda Pittman and M.P., a minor child, by next friend Plaintiff
Defendant:
Officer Clifton Sessoms, Officer Natassia M. Dearsley, Officer J.K. Monson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
IN RE: Abbott Laboratories Spinal Cord Stimulator Products Liability Litigation
as MDL No. 3194
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Liaison Counsel for Defendants
Pattison v. HP Inc.
as 26-3923
Plaintiff:
MARY PATTISON, Plaintiff on behalf or herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HP INC.
NAS PLAINTIFFS
as 1:2026cv05137
Petitioner:
donald NAS PLAINTIFFS
Objector:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30907 Procedure for Hearing and Determination
in re: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium (NPK) Antitrust Litigation **COUNSEL: DO NOT ADD PARTIES.****Individual Plaintiffs/Defendants Will Not Appear on the Docket Sheet.**
as 6:2026md03187
Unknown:
Nitrogen, Phorsphorus, and Potassium (NPK) Fertilizer Antitrust, All Plaintiffs (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY) and All Defendants (for Lead/Liaison Counsel ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Doe Student Pltfs 1-13 et al v. Doe, AI Companies 1-10 et al
as 5:2026cv04120
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE PLAINTIFFS 1-13 and Jane Doe, Parent Plaintiffs 1-18
Defendant:
John Doe, AI Companies 1-10, N.S., K.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
