Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chrome Hearts, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv01109
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Chen Lifang, A Li Yun and others
Plaintiff:
Chrome Hearts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03374
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Booloon, Inc., et al v. Google, Inc., et al
as 13-56362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOOLOON, INC., a Delaware Corporation and QIN ZHANG, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, NICK MOTE, an individual, BOSTWICK & JASSY LLP, a California Limited Partnership and others
Booloon Inc et al v. Google Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00024
Defendant:
Richard D Aldrich, Gary Bostwick, Bostwick and Jassy LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Booloon Inc and Qin Zhang
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
