Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tiffany Roberts v. Staff Attorney 4, et al
as 23-12976
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIFFANY ROBIN ROBERTS
Respondent / Appellee:
STAFF ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, SCOTT ANDERSON, D A, GARRICK VICKERY, Prosecutor and others
Nadya Diaz v. Adam Hames, et al
as 23-11209
Petitioner / Appellant:
NADYA IVETTE DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM MARSHALL HAMES, MATTHEW KYLE WINCHESTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA and others
Tamiko N. Peele v. The United States Department of Justice through it, et al
as 22-14096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THROUGH ITS UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM, REGION 21 AND IT'S OFFICIALS THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, ERIK P. KIMBALL and others
Tamiko N. Peele v. The United States Department of Justice through it, et al
as 22-13173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE, And Tamiko N. Peele, Individually On Behalf Of Themselves
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THROUGH ITS UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM, REGION 21 AND IT'S OFFICIALS THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, ERIK P. KIMBALL and others
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT L. WALKER
Alex Higdon v. Gail Tusan, et al
as 17-11127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX HIGDON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL S. TUSAN, KRYSTAL MOORE, BENSONETTA TIPTON-LANE and others
Alex Higdon v. Gail Tusan, et al
as 15-15597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX HIGDON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL S. TUSAN, KRYSTAL MOORE, BENSONETTA TIPTON-LANE and others
William McCavey v. Marsha Gold, et al
as 15-10613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. MCCAVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHA DEBRA GOLD, GARY MARKWELL & PC, GEORGIA LORD, Staff Attorney and others
Warren Jackson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP-I, et al
as 10-13985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN LAVELL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP-I, Tracy Johns, FORMER WARDEN STAN YATES, STAFF ATTORNEY JEFFRE CAMPBELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
