Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Perry v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00748
Plaintiff:
Quantez N Perry
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Kim Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Hassel et al
as 4:2014cv00738
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Defendant:
Scott Hassel, Scott Pitman, George H Lund, III and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Roper et al
as 2:2014cv00717
Plaintiff:
Demaraaron C. Johnson
Defendant:
A. C. Roper and Janice Hatcher
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belue v. Benn et al
as 2:2014cv00688
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Belue
Defendant:
John R Benn, Gary W Alverson and Vicki Gamble
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Hutton
as 7:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Gates
Defendant:
John Hutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Laseter et al
as 2:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Mark Hughes Carter
Defendant:
Laseter, Reni Mason and Kim Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Pavlakovic et al
as 4:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Walker
Defendant:
David Pavlakovic, Michelle Snedeker and Mr. Wheat
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00639
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Matthew Dean Stinson, Barlow and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favors v. Thomas
as 5:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
Norman Favors
Defendant:
Kim Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Carroll et al
as 7:2014cv00530
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wilkerson
Defendant:
Jennifer A. Carroll and ATEF
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
