Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
DUBOSE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff: ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Attkisson et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01106
Defendant: Sharyl Thompson Attkisson and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, United States of America and Department of Justice
Petitioner: Sarah Judith Starr Attkisson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Ueon Bak v. Patrick Donahoe, et al
as 17-56511
Plaintiff - Appellant: UEON BAK
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK DONAHOE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Dorothy Perkins v. Patrick Donahoe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2896
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOROTHY PERKINS, for the Estate of Alice Perkins, deceased
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perkins v. Donahoe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv05226
Plaintiff: Dorothy Perkins
Defendant: Patrick R. Donahoe and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Oscar Dantzler v. EEOC, et al
as 12-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant: Oscar Dantzler
Defendant - Appellee: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Keith Hills, Agent Does One-Five and others
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02149
Plaintiff: OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant: UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, KEITH HILLS, AGENT DOES ONE-FIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?