Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wang & Gao Family Trust et al v. TA Partners LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02446
Plaintiff:
Wang & Gao Family Trust, Lingyun Gu, Jingbo Xiao and others
Defendant:
TA Partners LLC, TA Partners Apartment Fund II LLC, Chienshen (Johnny) Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Wrice v. Wen Georgia, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05105
Plaintiff:
James Wrice
Defendant:
Meritage Hospitality Group Inc. doing business as Wendy's Restaurant, John Doe Corporation 1, John Doe Corporation 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sutton v. Wen Georgia, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Melisha Sutton
Defendant:
The Wendy's Company, Wendy's Restaurant #104, Linda L. Clausen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wen v. McGill
as 1:2017cv01207
Plaintiff:
Long Wen
Defendant:
Tamica McGill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wen v. McGill
as 1:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Long Wen
Defendant:
Tamica McGill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
