Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Li v. Dong et al.
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Guang Xiong Li
Defendant:
Li Rong Dong, Wei Dong, Li Yong Dong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lane v. Haozhi et al
as 1:2022cv01485
Plaintiff:
John K. Lane
Defendant:
Yang Haozhi, Yang Liang, Ge Bing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Park et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Yong Suk Park, Young Hae Je, Ji Min Park and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Julie Decker
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cho v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04581
Plaintiff:
Yong Tae Cho
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delta T, LLC v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv00559
Defendant:
Vortikul Ltd., Dafydd & Yong, Pte. Ltd. and David T. Williams
Plaintiff:
Delta T, LLC doing business as Big Ass Fans
Counter Defendant:
Delta T, LLC
Petitioner:
Leo Ming Min Rachel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00731
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02101
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Qi v. Ichiban at Mt. Lookout Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Lian Hui Qi
Defendant:
Ichiban at Mt. Lookout Inc. , Aqua Restaurant, LLC , Qing Song Pan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
