Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00303
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00515
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOSEPH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOSEPH
Defendant:
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 rsi Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Melvin Jones v. CJ Stulek, et al
as 13-5009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin A. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
CJ Stulek, Judge and Michael James Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
DAVIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
JOANN DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Assoc., Amer. Physicians, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-5003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. and Alliance for Natural Health USA
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services, in her official capacity, Michael James Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, in his official capacity, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
GILLILAND v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK C. GILLILAND
Defendant:
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SHADEROCK v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01912
Plaintiff:
LOUIS SHADEROCK
Defendant:
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CARNETT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01848
Plaintiff:
RICKEY D. CARNETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WISE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01752
Plaintiff:
CONNELL WISE
Defendant:
MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
