Cases 11 - 20 of 1,078
Manasher v. Karimova-Cromas et al
as 2:2024cv04220
Plaintiff:
David Maier Manasher
Defendant:
Elmira Karimova-Cromas and Saniya Karimova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WISNIEWSKI v. PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY LLC
as 2:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE WISNIEWSKI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WISNIEWSKI v. MARKET STREET CVS, INC. ET AL
as 2:2024cv01235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
STERN v. FLYNN et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
EVERETT STERN
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. FLYNN, JOSEPH FLYNN, BINNALL LAW FIRM LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MITCHELL v. BURLINGTON COAT FACALITY et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COAT FACALITY, SECURITY GUARD and CLERK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Frank Giordano, et al v. Andrews Hohns, et al
as 24-1305
Plaintiff:
FRANK GIORDANO and DANIEL M. DILELLA
Defendant:
ANDREWS HOHNS, NOAH GRIFFIN, JAMES SWANSON and others
TORNILLO et al v. HORN et al
as 3:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
KALINA TORNILLO and MICHAEL TORNILLO
Defendant:
JEFF J. HORN, ESQ., HORN LAW GROUP, LLC and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEON v. HANOCH et al
as 2:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LEON
Defendant:
NEHAMA HANOCH and CHEYENNE GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Copeland v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Diana Copeland
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Lifetime Entertainment Services, LLC and A&E Television Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MOSLEY v. STARBUCKS
as 2:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
STARBUCKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
