Cases 1 - 10 of 4,553
NEW v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
JOELLE NEW
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brooks v. Roetting
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Shareena Brooks
Defendant:
Micahel P Roetting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown-Bey v. Franklin County Commisioners et al
as 2:2024cv02163
Plaintiff:
Wayne Brown and Wayne Lee Brown-Bey
Defendant:
Franklin County Commisioners, David Young, Richard Rezie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wonser v. Norman et al
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wonser
Defendant:
Charles L. Norman, Andy Wilson and Thomas Stickrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Wright Patterson AFB
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ellis
Defendant:
Wright Patterson AFB
Edwards v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Edwards
Defendant:
Jay Manning and Davyne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
North v. Village of West Milton, et al.
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jerry North
Defendant:
Village of West Milton, Doyle Wright, James Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chapman v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Justin Davis, Consultants to Government and Industry Incorporated, 4 Real Estate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Clark v. Blueprint Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Blueprint Investments, LLC, Brysod Anderson, Aaron McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
