Cases 31 - 40 of 24,495
Bridges v. USA
as 1:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Luterres Montez Bridges
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraway v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02263
Petitioner:
Romilus Caraway
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Harold Vernon Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Rasheem Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dowdy v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Antwion Dowdy
Defendant:
Warden Vincent Vantell, Core Civic, Inc., f/n/u Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. T.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilson
Defendant:
T.D.O.C. and Tennessee Board of Parole and Probation The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
