Cases 81 - 90 of 544,892
Downs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Edward L Downs, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Koch v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02185
Plaintiff:
Mary Koch
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Ralph Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dexter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
David Allen Dexter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown-Bey v. Franklin County Commisioners et al
as 2:2024cv02163
Plaintiff:
Wayne Brown and Wayne Lee Brown-Bey
Defendant:
Franklin County Commisioners, David Young, Richard Rezie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dickinson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02166
Plaintiff:
Brian Wayne Dickinson and Kimberley Dickinson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doughty v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Edward James Doughty, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dowdle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02168
Plaintiff:
LaToria Dowdle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Easley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02169
Plaintiff:
Darren Easley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fugate v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02171
Plaintiff:
Linda Fugate
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
