Cases 51 - 60 of 165,660
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hirmer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01991
Plaintiff:
Peter Hirmer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01995
Plaintiff:
James Mark Allen and Leah Allen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01996
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hebert v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01997
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hebert
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lloyd v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Lacey S. Lloyd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sheetz, Inc. et al v. City of Centerville, OH et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Sheetz, Inc., Morse Road Development LLC and Hemmert Far Hills Properties LLC
Defendant:
City of Centerville, OH, City Council of the City of Centerville, OH, Graceworks Lutheran Services d/b/a/ Bethany Lutheran Village and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00812
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Donna Darlene Bishop
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
American Contractors Indemnity Company v. Nuko Paving, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Defendant:
NUKO PAVING, INC., N-LINE CONTRACTING CORP, BLACKSTONE ASPHALT, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
