Cases 1 - 10 of 4,787
NELSON v. WARDLOW
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
BILLY JOE NELSON
Respondent:
JERRY WARDLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. FCI Milan
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Rashaud L. Coleman
Respondent:
FCI Milan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caraway v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02263
Petitioner:
Romilus Caraway
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
as 2:2024cv02259
Petitioner:
Stephon Depaul Burton
Respondent:
Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Darcel D. Wright
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nwokoro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02246
Petitioner:
Uwanbunkonye Nwokoro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02242
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferies v. Vantell
as 3:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Joseph Marquis Jefferies
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02240
Petitioner:
Devonte Mason
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
