Cases 21 - 30 of 37,528
Marquice Bruce v. Twin Towers County Facility
as 5:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Marquice Bruce
Defendant:
Twin Towers County Facility, Leora, Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
David Anthony Dean v. Unknown
as 5:2024cv00973
Petitioner:
David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angel Torres v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Angel Torres
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christopher Lipsey Jr. v. Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr
Defendant:
Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy, Captain Z. Soisuvarn, Lieutenant A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving Aguilar-Calixto v. Thomas Tyler
as 8:2024cv00596
Petitioner:
Irving Aguilar-Calixto
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Audley G. Evans v. The United States of America
as 5:2024cv00959
Petitioner:
Audley G. Evans, II
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
