Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,544
Hargrove, ex rel. T.H., a minor et al vs O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03790
Plaintiff: Terrence Hargrove, ex rel. T.H., a minor
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DICKERSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00778
Plaintiff: ANDREW D. DICKERSON
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01180
Plaintiff: Dinah Richardson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TODARO v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03762
Plaintiff: JAMES TODARO
Defendant: Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shilts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff: LORI ANNE SHILTS
Defendant: Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitaker v. O'Malley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff: Kenneth Whitaker
Defendant: Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DEKEN v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: THOMAS R. DEKEN
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARDEN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff: JOSEPH R. HARDEN
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff: STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dominguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01942
Plaintiff: Byran I. Dominguez
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?