Cases 11 - 20 of 380
Canfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Brian J. Canfield
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Olson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Sara Morrill Olson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Kyle Steven Taylor
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sharp v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jerold Sharp
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Amy Mae Robinson
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hyde v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Nichole Leann Hyde
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Raatz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00573
Petitioner:
Kristen Dawn Raatz
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perotto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Sherry Gay Perotto
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shoop v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
Jay Shoop
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wickard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Sheri Lynn Wickard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
