Cases 1 - 10 of 3,115
Powell v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
David Powell
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 231 Railroad Retirement Act of 1974
McKnight v. CRST Lincoln Sales Inc
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McKnight
Defendant:
CRST Lincoln Sales Inc doing business as CRST The Transportation Solution Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Krashunda Giles
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dawson et al v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dawson and Timothy Weakley
Defendant:
Lauderdale County, State of Alabama, Lauderdale County Revenue Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Orrick v. ARstrat LLC
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Cindy Orrick
Defendant:
ARstrat LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vestal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
James Vestal
Defendant:
MD Karen Ballard Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 233 Civil Actions or Proceedings Against Commissioned Officers or Employees
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Combs et al v. Staggs et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Bradley Combs
Defendant:
Timothy Staggs, Timothy Weakley, Hannah Weakley Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hitt v. Frost-Arnett Company Inc
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hitt
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
as 2:2024mc04020
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
