Cases 11 - 20 of 10,115
Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10565
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Licht v. Zhao et al
as 1:2024cv10447
Plaintiff:
Leonard Licht
Defendant:
Changpeng Zhao, Binance Holdings LTD, d/b/a Binance.com, BAM Trading Services, Inc. d/b/a Binance.US and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Pena
as 1:2024cv11061
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eva Pena
S2 Growth I LLC v. Romulus Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10398
Plaintiff:
S2 Growth I LLC
Defendant:
Romulus Capital Management, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth III LP, Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
De La Paz v. 2U, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11049
Plaintiff:
Henry De La Paz
Defendant:
2U, Inc. and edX, LLC
Exergen Corporation v. Baxter International, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11008
Plaintiff:
Exergen Corporation
Defendant:
Baxter International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Harding v. Costco
as 1:2024cv10981
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Costco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heinz v. Customer Contact Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv11001
Plaintiff:
Austin Heinz
Defendant:
Customer Contact Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
