Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,555
BANKS et al v. BOSWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff: JALEN BANKS and DONAVAN SANFORD
Defendant: THOMAS BOSWELL, BOSWELL FARMS ENTERPRISES LLC, BOSWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pitman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01888
Plaintiff: Nadira Pitman
Defendant: Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv01889
Plaintiff: Nadera Pittman
Defendant: Ali Brown and Demna Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Motley Broom v. College Park, Georgia
as 1:2024cv00937
Plaintiff: Bianca Motley Broom
Defendant: College Park, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv01851
Plaintiff: Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant: Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant: Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff: Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant: The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: JAMES CARLAN
Defendant: JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff: AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant: JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: James Lamont Taylor
Defendant: Freedom Mortgage Corporation and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?