Cases 1 - 10 of 102,513
Modica v. USA
as 3:2024cv01073
Petitioner:
Jerrell Lee Modica
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Anderson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01681
Petitioner:
DLance Chazion Anderson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Galveston Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harvey, Jr
Defendant:
Galveston Police Department and Officer L. Mearlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shead et al v. State of Texas Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Travarus Shead, Enrique Guerra and Barry Emmett
Defendant:
State of Texas Corporation, Greg Abbot, Lieutenant Governor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jaime Elizondo
Defendant:
State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Carillio
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Keyon Carillio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barnes v. TDCJ
as 3:2024cv01038
Petitioner:
MonQuas Barnes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1071
as 3:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1071
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
