Cases 21 - 30 of 12,284
IN RE: WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
as 2:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURRAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON LUBIEJEWSKI, JAMES MCNESBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE QUINZEL KK CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL KK CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN V. COMM OF PA
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
PAUL COHEN
Defendant:
COMM OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
Warden Nicholas, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Mrs. Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BRYAN TRUSH, BARBARA A. MCDERMOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bicking v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Guy Bicking
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJOR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
JOHN R MAJOR
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI GREENE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
