Cases 21 - 30 of 13,427
Huffman v. Woods et al
as 7:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Woods, Osborne, S. Gullett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jennings
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Mack A. Bailey, Jr., Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Clear et al
as 7:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Steve Clear, Major Parks, Captain Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Anna-Elise Bowman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Chavis Rashad Williams
Defendant:
Eric Young, Leslie Powell and Wyant Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goad v. Patrick County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Goad
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail, Deputy(s), Deputy Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pretty v. Richmond Commonwealth Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Eric Pretty
Defendant:
Richmond Commonwealth Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Clayborne
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
John Lamb and John W. Lamb, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown, LT Clayborne, D C Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Wallace
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Gregory Holloway, Rick White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
